Perhaps I should ask these guys about it. |
And by reflect I mean, in no particular order: rejoice, relax, rage, cry, moan, fear, whine, embrace grace, fall apart all over again, and a few other variations on the theme. To be honest, even though I knowI'm much less sick than I was the last time, my mind has partitioned off the pain of the experience such that I'm trying to remind myself that this isn't the worst I've ever felt. 'Cause it sure seems like it.
Set aside your usual expectations of my sunny aplombitude for a few paragraphs here.
Chemotherapy is Hell. It feels conceived, truly, by the devil. It kills you slowly, from the inside, while your body helplessly and continuously inflames from its already impaired status in a futile attempt to defend itself from the best allopathic medical science has to offer. You might be done in a week, but you won't be, because the neutropenia of the declining white blood cells causes a fever which the doctors then blast with intravenous antibiotics. These are every bit as miserable as chemo. No one would be subject to a course of chemo this long, but somehow antibiotics are different, I guess. Oh, well, they are just doing their best.
For me, appetite disappears, the mouth turns to dust and chalk, every mouthful causes a rebellion, but hunger doesn't necessarily go. So nights can be sleepless agonies of starvation and even convulsive abdominal pains, but the chemo and the antibiotics have conspired to destroy the digestive tract so there are no enzymes, acids or flora to help break stuff down. Every bite is followed by stunning heartburn. The mouth can fill with painful sores, and the bowel looses toxic diarrhea. Of course, there are drugs for these things, which have terrible side effects for me in terms of rebound symptoms and self-perpetuating discomfort. The topicals also are full of lovely chemical flavorings and aspartame, just to make sure I don't stand a chance.
My body is strong and noble, and it fights against this assault with relentless vigor. I spend long hours trying to talk it down, explaining that the messenger may have had a point to make but his methods were destroying the host, that cancer may be information for my body but my body can't endure it and all I have is a bulldozer for assistance at this point.
In 1911, Dr. John Beard published his research on the cause of epithelial cancers and developed a successful enzyme protocol. In 1967, Dr. William Kelly published his continuation of Dr. Beard's research. Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez continues in their footsteps today, and the clinical successes continue to mount. Drs. Gerson, Budwig and Burzynski have incredible verifiable testimonials of miracle stories associated with their work, all of which rely on building on the body's strength and giving it tools to repress the cancer itself. When I had cancer the first time, I didn't know enough about these organizations and I didn't feel I had time to find out. I've learned a lot since then, so I felt some relief that at least, should I receive a repeat diagnosis, I would have alternatives.
But I don't. These organizations don't treat my type of cancer, it turns out. I don't even want to know why, really. I have found lots of tantalizing tidbits, natural therapies that seem promising, but no clinics. There are a few scattered, unsubstantiated claims on the internet (which isn't to say that I doubt them, I just am not willing to stake my life on them), and lots of people making pronouncements who have never actually had or treated acute myeloid leukemia successfully. I recognize that research requires risk, but I only have one body to work with, as was pointed out to me. I can't just throw stuff at the wall. I need some kind of argument for why something is going to be effective. I am wide open to the idea that there are powerful healing modalities that work outside conventional paradigms, but I need something to hold onto. I have a husband and two small children. I will go to Hell for them if I have to. And I have to.
As recently as the seventies, more than half a century after Dr. Beard's work, no one knew what to do about leukemia. Acute leukemia was a death sentence. The mechanism behind it doesn't act like the mechanism behind epithelial cancers, so the increase in incidence is an opportunity for smart and insightful doctors outside the scorched earth school to assemble the existing work of far-flung healers and the powerful research tools now available to find a better path. Now, however, although we won't dance with the numbers, the medical docs have got something. My odds are very, very good. I am going to walk away from this cancer-free, and in the years to follow I'll lose the limp as well. The current batch of therapies does cure this cancer, not for five years, but FOREVER, when it works. And it is going to work on me. I have a fabulous physician, who cares deeply about his patients and is genuinely open to customizing treatment as much as is possible within his framework. I am strong enough to go through this. I plan to outlive him, and he expects it, too.
I can fall into this abyss, and float there, and endure its torments because Love carries me. I can feel it coming in, all the time. I am an engine of it. Do not be confused when you call or send a text and I tell you I'm good, and then you read this. I can be well and sick at the same time; good and not-good. I can rejoice that someday this will be history, not just for me, but for anyone who has this diagnosis. "[We] cannot decide [what times we live in]. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."-JRR Tolkien.
All I've got is a Conestoga Wagon. No passenger jets yet. Still, it will get me to California, and there's gold in the hills.
Sarah my love, I am with you there in that room with a view of the dumpster and all it's curiosities and cast offs. Thank you for allowing us on this journey with you. We can all cry together and laugh together and be brave as well. I was thinking about our conversation regarding bravery. The dictionary I referenced, defines brave as 'ready to face and endure danger and pain, to show courage.' It's literary definition is 'fine or splendid in appearance.' Now if you go further the word fine means, '(of a person) worthy of or eliciting admiration.' You see where I'm going with all this? We could also use the more contemporary meaning of 'fine'- cause you is. My love is with you my friend, as is my deep admiration and unending support.
ReplyDelete